The curatorial and editorial project for systems, non-
New Paintings: Jonathan Parsons
New Art Projects
17 Riding House Street, London, W1W 7DS.
12 Nov to 22 Dec 2014
A review by Judith Duquemin
Colour wheels and colour terminology have provided painters and their contemporaries
with a basic guide for classifying and mixing colours in order to create certain
visual effects. The history of colour theory has drawn a wide range of comments from
many disciplines across the ages. Early attempts to define primary colours relied
on sensory experience until a scientific explanation was produced. The proposition
that painters can mix all the colours -
Isaac Newton (c. 1666) turned the tables, stating in his book, Theory of Colour, that all colour comes from light reflection and refraction. Objects appear to be certain colours because of the way they absorb and reflect different amounts and wavelengths of light. Newton used mathematical calculations to decide the position of colours on the colour wheel, resulting in the colour terms: primary, secondary, and tertiary colours, complementary colours, and analogous colour. Inspired by Newton, Moses Harris (c. 1730), an English entomologist and engraver, created a colour wheel made up of the three primary colours, red, yellow and blue, to support ‘a painter’s art’, stating that primary colours were pure colours that could not be mixed.
“I’m sure that the Basic Colour Terms are to do with our ancient biological history and the naming of day and night, pigments of the earth, the sky and sea, foliage and being able to discriminate between various fruits and flowers. As a species, we are adept at interpreting a multitude of significations embedded in our environment and science has only amplified this. I wondered why our eyes have peak sensitivity to the ‘yellow’ part of the spectrum. Perhaps it is to do with the yellowish colour of sunlight; that it is an adaptation to survival through observation in diurnal conditions. It seems to me that it is possible to discern a huge number of different types of ‘green’. Perhaps this was an adaptive advantage for our ancestors; an ability to distinguish between all the varieties of plants and to recognise particular stages in their cycles of growth by sight alone. Also, it must have been an advantage to be able to make a distinction between the appearances of predator and prey animals and the variegated green background against which they would have often been perceived”. (Jonathan Parsons, Basic Colour Terms. Thursday 10 June 2010. Notebook, www.jonathanparsons.com)
Jonathan Parsons. Break of Day. Enamel on birch ply. 90 x 136 x 2.5 cm. 2014
Jonathan Parsons. R, G, B. Enamel on birch ply, three panels. Dimensions each panel: 24 cm diameter. 2013
Jonathan Parsons. The First Five Colours. Enamel on birch ply. 200 x 40 x cm. 2014
There are two types of colour systems that differentiate between traditional and
digital colour systems, both of which Parsons has chosen to investigate. These are
known as subtractive and additive colour systems. Subtractive colour systems apply
to material, pigment-
CMYK. Enamel on birch ply. 144 x 36 x 2 cm. 2013
The exhibition is made up of two types of shaped panel: ‘stacked discs’, and ‘two
multiple rectangles’. For all his works, Parsons has used a technique of drip painting
known as ‘controlled pouring’ to demonstrate that simple systems such as primary
colour combinations, and time-
The shaped panels are not pictorial: they are not images or compositions; they are not contrived. Parsons describes them as a collection of concrete processes, in that outcomes occur simply by the way they happen. Here is an example of the way he works, in his own words:
CMYK: “…comprises the four-
The same technique has been applied to some of the other circular works. But in some
instances the shapes are intentionally rotated, or have been over-
Jonathan Parsons. R + G = Y. Enamel on birch ply. 200 x 100 x 3 cm. 2013
“The rectangular works, entitled Break of Day and Interference, contain grooves that
divide into sub-
(Jonathan Parsons)
Parsons, born in 1970 in Redhill, England, and now represented by the Artists’ Agency, UK, attended the University of London Goldsmiths College, and came to prominence in 1997 when his dissected map sculpture Carcass (1994) was selected for inclusion in the notorious Sensation exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts, which toured to Berlin and New York.
His work was selected for the British Art Show 5 in 2000. His permanently installed architectural map sculpture Let Me Count the Ways was commissioned in 2008 by the UK Government Art Collection for the new British Embassy in Dohar, Qatar. His latest commissions include: For John Constable, a landscape installation for Salisbury Arts Centre in 2011, and Cruciform Vision, a painting for Guildford Cathedral (2011). His latest solo exhibition, Zed’s Dead, took place at the The Arch Gallery, London in 2012. Recent group exhibitions include: Mind the Map (London Transport Museum), Meanwhile (John Hansard Gallery), The Art of Mapping (TAG Fine Arts, London), A Dialogue on Landscape & Constable (Abigail Reynolds and Jonathan Parsons, Salisbury Arts Centre), Waldweben (Kasteel Schuurlo, Belgium), and the Jerwood Sculpture Prize (Jerwood Space, London). His work is represented in public collections in the UK and private collections around the world. (New Art Projects. Room Sheet. London. 2014.)
Jonathan Parsons. Installation View. Study for ‘So-
©Copyright Patrick Morrissey and Clive Hancock All rights reserved.
The 2010 notebook entry on Jonathan Parsons’ website provides a suitable introduction to his 2014 solo exhibition of ‘drip paintings’, in enamel on birch ply, at New Art Projects, London. Developed over two years, they demonstrate an attempt to address “the linguistic evolution of colour terms” and what he describes as “the conceptual straitjacket of the painter’s colour wheel”. But Parsons questions the validity of these terms, particularly in regard to the interpretation of digital colour systems. In particular, he challenges the definitions of primary colour, or primaries, which he claims do not reflect visual reality, and are “the product of ‘abstract philosophical ideals, cultural conventions, and the happenstance of biology”. In a statement supporting the exhibition, he writes:
“Any model reliant on three primary sources can only produce a limited gamut of colours that will always fall short of what the human eye can perceive”. (Jonathan Parsons. Artist statement: New Paintings 2014)
We all perceive three primary colours: red, blue and green, via cone cells located in the retina (Hermann von Helmholtz c.1850). Parsons’ argument relies on the fact that additional mental functions are at work, unless our biology has adapted to the advancing technological world. To believe this would be contradictory; instead, Parsons suggests that we make personal associations with certain colours as a matter of individual interpretation, despite the limitations of our colour receptors.
Other contributions came from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (c.1749), Michel Eugène
Chevreul (c.1786), and Johannes Itten (c.1904). Goethe was the first to systematically
study the physiological effects of colour, influencing the philosophers Arthur Schopenhauer
and Ludwig Wittgenstein, and the English artist, JMW Turner. Chevreul, a French
industrial chemist working with coloured yarn dyes, devised the concepts ‘simultaneous
contrast’, ‘Chevreul’s illusion’ and ‘chiaroscuro’, whereby the perception of colours
were influenced by the proximity, light intensity and contrast of the surrounding
colours. All of this had a great influence on later art movements in Europe. Johannes
Itten (c.1904) developed a three-